Skip to main content
· 7/1/1850

Clark v. Viles

Citations

  • 32 Me. 32

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that, in rare circumstances, courts have made an exception when the movant’s pro se motion was not timely filed due to active interference by some third party

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.