Clark v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence that a defendant’s brother had “a key and access to the residence and use of a bedroom” was sufficient to establish that the resident had “common authority” over “common areas in the residence,” including the hallway from which police saw the contraband at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).