Skip to main content

Clark v. State

Citations

  • 68 Fla. 433
  • 67 So. 135

Syllabus

<p>1. An indictment’should not be quashed on account of any defect in the form thereof, unless the- court shall be of the opinion that the indictment is so vague, indistinct and indefinite as to mislead the accused and embarrass him in the preparation of his defense or expose him after conviction or acquittal to substantial danger of a new prosecution for the - same offense.</p> <p>2. Testimony given, by a bankrupt in bankruptcy proceedings, under the provisions of the 7th Section of the U. S. Bankruptcy Act, is not admissible against such bankrupt in a criminal prosecution instituted against him for embezzlement in the State court.</p>

Judges: Cockrell, Hocker, Shackleford, Taylor, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.