Clark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Congress’ enactment of Section 522(o) was prompted in large part by Florida’s ‘virtually limitless’ homestead law. ‘Sections 522(o) and 522(p

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-17· cited 29×
• Akers v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-01-21· cited 8×
• State v. Mark Marks, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-12-26· cited 2×
• RICO S. YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-18
• HONORE L. CLINTON v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-10-31
• BARRY TUCKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-06
• RICO S. YOUNG v. STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-01
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-05-01

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Cotton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-06-15· cited 311×
• Grant v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-11-02· cited 287×
• Ellis v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-06· cited 102×
• McKnight v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-10-05· cited 87×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-24· cited 56×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-04· cited 43×
• Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. Conquest
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-06· cited 20×
• Clark v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-02-04· cited 6×