Clark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing the State is not bound by the date alleged in the indictment \so long as the date proved is anterior to the filing of the State's pleadings and not so remote as to show that the offense is barred by the statute of limitations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ex Parte Alexander
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-13· cited 121×
• Webber v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-06-15· cited 42×
• Meyers v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-06-30· cited 33×
• Rushton v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-06-06· cited 23×
• De La Rosa v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1981-12-30· cited 9×
• Honc v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1985-09-19· cited 8×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-02-24· cited 7×
• William Rufus Barnes v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1996-07-03
• Dawn E. Webber v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-06-15
• Sandra Luz Bearden v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-01-31

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stephenson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-23· cited 192×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-05-03· cited 74×
• Vaughn v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-07-15· cited 21×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1974-02-13· cited 20×
• Neal v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1964-01-29· cited 12×