Clark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the court had ample time to comply with USCR 32.1 while still meeting the time requirements of defendant’s speedy trial demand, court’s noncompliance with that rule was error
• court’s noncompliance with USCR 32.1 wholly inadequate where no evidence showing court did not have ample time to comply and still meet time requirements of defendant’s demand for speedy trial
• court’s complete failure to comply with USCR 32.1 was an abuse of discretion, so that defendant’s failure to appear for trial of which she received no notice did not amount to a waiver of her speedy trial demand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Higuera-Hernandez v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-07-11· cited 26×
• Ingram v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-07-18· cited 7×
• State v. Hitchcock
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-04-17· cited 2×
• Trimm v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-05-14· cited 1×
• Heard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2011-03-28

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Callaway v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-07-15· cited 46×
• Kellibrew v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-09-02· cited 28×
• Ballew v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-01-13· cited 19×
• McKnight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-12-05· cited 14×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-01-19· cited 6×
• Riley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-03-22· cited 4×