Clark v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• pure conjecture as to what a witness’s testimony would have been is not sufficient to show a reasonable probability the result at trial would have been different
• pure conjecture as to what a witness's testimony would have been is not sufficient to show a reasonable probability the result at trial would have been different
• “[P]ure conjecture” about how an expert witness would testify is not sufficient “to establish the result would probably change if a new trial is had”
• “Impeachment or exculpatory evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
• “[E]xculpatory evidence is material only if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
• this Court will reverse the grant of PCR based upon after-discovered evidence where movant must fails to demonstrate the evidence: (1) is such that it would probably change the result if a new trial were granted; (2) has been discovered since the trial; (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Von Dohlen
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-05-28· cited 85×
• State v. Taylor
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-23· cited 71×
• Glover v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1995-06-19· cited 42×
• Jamison v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2014-10-22· cited 29×
• State v. Salisbury
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1998-02-17· cited 17×
• Charles Vandross v. Bryan Stirling
  Fourth Circuit· 2021-01-26· cited 15×
• McCoy v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-02-06· cited 13×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-12-10· cited 10×
• State v. Gill
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-07-17· cited 10×
• Jamison v. Cohen
  D. South Carolina· 2016-09-30· cited 1×
• State v. Bland
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-07-18

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brady v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
• United States v. Bagley
  Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
• Pennsylvania v. Ritchie
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
• State v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-22· cited 23×
• State v. Caskey
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-06-11· cited 18×
• State v. South
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-02-22· cited 14×
• Hayden v. State
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-26· cited 9×