Skip to main content
· 7/1/1921

Clark v. Spheen

Citations

  • 271 Pa. 91
  • 114 A. 496
  • 1921 Pa. LEXIS 461

Syllabus

<p>Mortgage — Payment—Possession of bond and mortgage — Presumption as to payment — Rebuttal—Evidence.</p> <p>On scire facias sur mortgage, where defendant show's he is in possession of and produces the original bond and mortgage, there is a presumption of payment; hut such presumption is one of fact only and not of law, and may be rebutted by evidence showing that the alleged payment was not intended as a discharge of the mortgage debt.</p>

Judges: Ferguson, Frazer, Kephart, Moschzisker, Sadler, Schaffer, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.