Skip to main content
· 2/14/2011

Clark v. ROCCANOVA

Citations

  • 772 F. Supp. 2d 844
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14704
  • 2011 WL 665621

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting dismissal of Section 2252 claim as to a defendant who was only alleged to have “acted in concert with” the other co-defendants and noting the lack of additional facts regarding that defendant’s involvement in transmitting the video

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jennifer B. Coffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.