· 2/25/2010
Clark v. RANDALLS FOOD
Citations
- 317 S.W.3d 351
- 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1431
- 2010 WL 670554
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding undisputed evidence showed plaintiff had established first prong of duty analysis where defendant acknowledged in its interrogatory answer that it knew substantial chance existed claim would be filed
- holding defendant had duty to preserve footage of events preceding plaintiff’s fall because it was aware of impending claim and was aware that footage of events preceding fall was relevant to her claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Elsa Alcala
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.