Skip to main content
· 2/25/2010

Clark v. RANDALLS FOOD

Citations

  • 317 S.W.3d 351
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1431
  • 2010 WL 670554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding undisputed evidence showed plaintiff had established first prong of duty analysis where defendant acknowledged in its interrogatory answer that it knew substantial chance existed claim would be filed
  • holding defendant had duty to preserve footage of events preceding plaintiff’s fall because it was aware of impending claim and was aware that footage of events preceding fall was relevant to her claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elsa Alcala

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.