Clark v. Public Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the PSC’s “obligation ... to protect a common carrier against competition” is secondary to its obligation to secure adequate and inexpensive service for the public
• “[T]he obligation of the [PSC] to protect a common carrier against competition in order to conserve existing investments is secondary to the paramount obligation of the Commission to secure adequate and permanent service for the public at the least possible cost.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Baltimore Steam Co. v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-08-31· cited 6×
• MD. TRANSP. CO. v. Public Serv. Comm'n
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1969-06-27· cited 2×
• American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. State Department of Assessments & Taxation
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-05-09· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Stroud
  Supreme Court· 1925-03-02· cited 63×
• Eichholz v. Public Service Commission of Missouri
  Supreme Court· 1939-02-27· cited 58×
• Albert v. Public Service Commission
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-02-09· cited 58×