Clark v. Olsen

Citations

• 3 Cal. Unrep. 890
• 33 P. 274
• 1893 Cal. LEXIS 1063

Syllabus

<p>Fraudulent Conveyance from Husband to Wife.—Where, in an action to set aside a conveyance from a husband to his wife as fraudulent as to plaintiff, a creditor of the husband, the evidence plainly supports a finding that the conveyance was not made with such intent, a judgment for defendants, based on such finding, will not be disturbed.</p> <p>Pleading-—Sham and Irrelevant Parts.—It was not reversible error to refuse to strike out certain parts of the answer as “sham, irrelevant, and redundant,” where they could have no effect upon, and were not necessary to support, the judgment.</p> <p>Fraudulent Conveyance—Evidence.—It was not Error to Exclude certain letters written by defendants to plaintiff, offered to show the financial condition of defendant husband, where the complaint alleged the husband’s insolvency, and the answer did no-t deny it.</p>