Clark v. McDaniel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no direct contractual relationship is required between the alleged tortfeasor and the person who justifiably relies to his or her detriment on the alleged tortfeasor’s representations, because “[u]nder Restatement (Second) of Torts section 533 (1977
• “[T]he remedies of cancellation of an instrument, or of a rescission, are not ordinarily provided where adequate relief is available in the form of a money judgment.” (citation omitted)
• a person who fraudulently misrepresents the truth can be held liable to third parties if they have a “reason to expect” that their misrepresentations will be communicated to third parties
• discussing when concealment is actionable in tort
• following Restatement §§ 531 & 533
• buyer and seller of used vehicle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).