Clark v. Luepke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the Consumer Protection Act’s use of “together with” as requiring damages for an award of attorneys’ fees
• plain language of consumer fraud statute allows the automobile repairman to charge and collect for work performed and parts supplied, notwithstanding violations of statute
• party claiming restitution of money paid involuntarily has burden of proving elements of claim, including payment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).