Clark v. Kraft Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that actual scope of investigation does not determine exhaustion but can create inference that claim was actually presented
• observing that actual scope of investigation does not determine exhaustion but can create inference that claim was actually presented
• disparate treatment claim based on gender within the scope of claims of sexual harassment actually presented to the EEOC
• a claimant may rely on a single set of 11 facts to support claims of both harassment and discrimination, but the two causes of action are distinct, and she must show that she exhausted her administrative remedies as to both claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).