Clark v. Keller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing conviction where circumstantial evidence required jury “to indulge an inference upon an inference that could lead but to conjecture”
• finding “no evidence as to whether the defendants ... took the truck and camper, save by way of inference ... and we believe that under the facts of this particular case, the jury had to indulge an inference upon an inference that could lead but to conjecture”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).