Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/28/2000

Clark v. Johnson

Citations

  • 202 F.3d 760
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1028
  • 2000 WL 96038

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disagreement between experts was insufficient to overcome state habeas court’s factual determination that the prosecution expert’s testimony was not false or misleading
  • “As a general principle, Rule 56 . . . applies with equal force in the context of habeas corpus cases.” (citations omitted)
  • “As a general principle, Rule 56 . . . applies with equal force in the context of habeas corpus cases.” (citations omitted)
  • Fifth Circuit has “repeatedly found that a paper hearing is sufficient to afford a petitioner a full and fair hearing on the factual issues underlying the petitioner’s claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Jolly, Demoss

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Clark v. Johnson

26 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.