Clark v. Havens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where “real issue” in claim couched as breach of contract was “whether there was fraud behind the global settlement,” claim “constitute[d] an improper collateral attack on a prior order.”
• where “real issue” in claim couched as breach of contract was “whether there was fraud behind the global settlement,” claim “constitute[d] an improper collateral attack on a prior order.”
• “Plaintiff has not alleged that it is a third-party beneficiary of any contracts entered into between defendants and the referred clients. . . . In the absence of such claim, only the parties to a contract have standing to sue for its breach[.]” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).