Clark v. Hambleton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a factual issue precluded summary judgment where the plaintiff had presented lay testimony that seatbelts had not functioned as intended, because issue was a “matter[ ] not of science but of skill and experience” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).