Skip to main content
· 1/15/1840

Clark v. Glover

Citations

  • 14 La. 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding an arbitration amendment was not “unreasonably one-sided” because it “d[id] not purport to render modifications retroactively applicable”
  • an adhesion contract will be found unconscionable only if the “terms [therein] are patently unfair to the weaker party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.