Skip to main content

Clark v. Eltinge

Citations

  • 39 Wash. 696
  • 83 P. 901
  • 1905 Wash. LEXIS 922

Syllabus

<p>Costs—Taxation—Affidavit—Burden oe Proof. Where a cost bill is verified in substantially the language of the statute and served within ton days after the filing of the opinion, the burden of proof will be on the opposite party to disprove the allegations thereof.</p> <p>Same—Foe Transcript. No costs for transcript, in excess of the amount paid to the clerk of the superior court therefor, can be recovered.</p> <p>Same—For Printing Briefs. Where the cost hill does not show that the amount paid for printing briefs was “actually and necessarily” paid, only 75 cents per -page will he allowed.</p> <p>Same—Folios. Ten cents per folio is the maximum amount that may be recovered for a statement of facts.</p> <p>Same—Service of Cost Bill. Where there is no proof of service, a cost bill will he disregarded.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.