Clark v. Dunn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• which found that the lower court erred by holding that qualified immunity was not a defense to simple negligence
• conservation officer and Department of Natural Resources had qualified immunity from suit alleging that officer was negligent in his “discretionary judgments, decisions, and actions” with regard to accidental wounding of hunter
• Qualified immunity is not limited to claims for constitutional violations!
• Qualified immunity is not limited to claims for constitutional violations.
• “We assume that the appellants expected to utilize [the state insurance policy] exception to the constitutional immunity of the State . . . in this action. 6 We recognize that in our limited holding in Jackson v. Belcher, 232 W.Va. 513, 753 S.E.2d 11 (2013

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).