Clark v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “equivocal nature” of treating physician’s testimony is sufficient basis for hearing examiner to reject opinion
• remanding where hearing examiner and Director of the Department of Employment Services failed to “properly conside[r]” treating physician’s testimony that wearing headset aggravated claimant’s condition
• “The presumption may be rebutted by evidence specific and comprehensive enough to sever the causal connection.” (citation omitted)
• current version at D.C. Code § 32-1501 (2001)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).