Clark v. Dep't of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a court must assure itself of its subject matter jurisdiction regardless of arguments made by the parties
• describing subject matter jurisdiction as the “threshold question” (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 88–89 (1998))
• describing subject matter jurisdiction as the “threshold question” (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 88–89 (1998))
• describing subject matter jurisdiction as the “threshold question” (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 88–89 (1998))
• describing subject matter jurisdiction as the “threshold question that must be resolved before proceeding to the merits” (citation, alteration, and quotation marks omitted)
• describing subject matter jurisdiction as the “threshold question” (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Env’t, 523 U.S. 83, 88–89 (1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).