Skip to main content
· 7/17/1996

Clark v. City of Albany

Citations

  • 921 P.2d 406
  • 142 Or. App. 207
  • 1996 Ore. App. LEXIS 1025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • annexation pro- posal was not one for the “proposed development of land” because it did “not encompass ‘development’ of the land or any other particular decision as to the specific uses to which land may be put”
  • declaratory judgment action relating to annexation presented a justiciable controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riggs, Landau, Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.