Clark v. Bres

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that sanctions were appropriate and just for party’s abusive conduct during the deposition
• “Imposing sanctions on a party without notice and an opportunity to be heard would violate the requirements of due process.”
• “”[S]uch hyperbole for emphasis is an accepted technique of oral advocacy and is part of our legal heritage and tradition.”
• “[T]he Texas Supreme Court [stated]: ‘the salutary right of counsel . . . to speak his mind is subject to obvious limits, which excessive language may exceed — either by connoting an idea or fact without support in the record or by its very character as inflammatory.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).