Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Indiana Court of Appeals· 7/24/2008

Clark v. Aris, Inc.

Citations

  • 890 N.E.2d 760
  • 2008 Ind. App. LEXIS 1599
  • 2008 WL 2839478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that where Baer’s employment did not put him in contact with the victims and nothing in his criminal history suggested that he was capable of murder, neither the victims nor the tragic harm that befell them was reasonably foreseeable
  • concluding that where Baer’s employment did not put him in contact with the victims and nothing in his criminal history suggested that he was capable of murder, neither the victims nor the tragic harm that'befell them was reasonably foreseeable
  • “A plaintiff could theoretically plead theories of liability in the alternative... .”
  • Under a theory of negligent retention and supervision, liability may be imposed on an employer when an employee “steps beyond the recognized scope of his employment to commit a tortious injury upon a third party.”
  • “To make a successful negligence claim, a plaintiff must establish three elements: (1) a duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff; (2) a breach of that duty; and (3) an injury proximately caused by the breach of that duty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Mathias, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Clark v. Aris, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.