· 9/12/2005
Clark v. Aiken County Government
Citations
- 620 S.E.2d 99
- 366 S.C. 102
- 2005 S.C. App. LEXIS 196
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining this court cannot override the commission's judgment with respect to the weight and credibility of evidence
- noting a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the Commission as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact; instead, review of issues of fact is limited to determining whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence in the record
- \An issue not raised in the application for review is not preserved for the [Appellate Panel's] consideration.\
- \An issue not raised in the application for review is not preserved for the full commission's consideration.\
- \The doctrine of res judicata ordinarily acts to preclude relitigation of issues or claims actually litigated or which might have been litigated in the first action.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cureton, Hearn, Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.