Clark Equipment Company v. Armstrong Equipment Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, even though detinue was an available remedy, seeking return of equipment from five different states made it inadequate and injunctive relief was proper
• holding federal courts have \the power to enforce State-created substantive rights by well-recognized equitable remedies even though such remedy might not be available in the courts of the State\
• holding federal courts have “the power to enforce State-created substantive rights by well- recognized equitable remedies even though such remedy might not be available in the courts of the State”
• “Federal courts in diversity cases [have] the power to enforce State-created substantive rights by well-recognized equitable remedies even though such remedy might not be available in the courts of the State.”
• “Federal courts in diversity cases [have] the power to enforce State-created substantive rights by well-recognized equitable remedies even though such remedy might not be available in the courts of the State.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).