Court of Appeals of Washington· 6/8/2015
Clark County v. McManus
Citations
- 188 Wash. App. 228
- 354 P.3d 868
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that McManus could argue that Dr. Won was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; thus, the trial court’s general instruction was sufficient
- concluding that '. MciVIanus could argue that Dr. \\Von was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; th~s, the trial court's general instruction was sufficient
- concluding that '. MciVIanus could argue that Dr. \\Von was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; th~s, the trial court's general instruction was sufficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cox, Dwyer, Spearman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clark County v. McManusWashington Supreme Court· 2016-04-28· cited 14×
- Felipe v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-12· cited 9×
- Clark County v. McManusWashington Supreme Court· 2015-12-02· cited 3×
- Reymundo Felipe v. Department Of Labor And Industries Of The State Of WaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-09-12
- Lake Hills Investments Llc, App/cross-res. v. Ap Rushforth Constr. Co., Inc., Res/cross-app.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-09-14
- Andrew Leitner v. City Of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-11-24
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court· 2010-06-28· cited 2,024×
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1997-04-17· cited 102×
- Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1988-09-22· cited 94×
- Groff v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1964-10-01· cited 69×
- Deep Water Brewing v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-10· cited 54×
- Deep Water Brewing, LLC v. Fairway Resources Ltd.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-10· cited 52×
- National Rifle Ass'n of America, Inc. v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2009-06-02· cited 50×
- Bryan v. John Bean Division of FMC Corp.Fifth Circuit· 1978-01-20· cited 48×
- Washington Federal v. HarveyWashington Supreme Court· 2015-01-08· cited 32×
- Chalmers v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court· 1967-11-30· cited 28×
- The Boeing Co. v. Harker-LottCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-30· cited 23×
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-08-24· cited 22×
- Stratton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1969-10-15· cited 18×
- Washington Federal v. GentryCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-02-18· cited 18×
- Homemakers Upjohn v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-01-28· cited 17×
- Gorre v. City of TacomaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-04-23· cited 14×
- Stratton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-10-16· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.