Skip to main content

Clark County v. McManus

Citations

  • 188 Wash. App. 228
  • 354 P.3d 868

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that McManus could argue that Dr. Won was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; thus, the trial court’s general instruction was sufficient
  • concluding that '. MciVIanus could argue that Dr. \\Von was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; th~s, the trial court's general instruction was sufficient
  • concluding that '. MciVIanus could argue that Dr. \\Von was better qualified to render an opinion as his treating physician and the jury was informed that it could accept this theory; th~s, the trial court's general instruction was sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cox, Dwyer, Spearman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.