Skip to main content
· 2/9/1996

Clark County Natural Resource Council v. Clark County

Citations

  • 80 Wash. App. 1042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that \the apparently routine executive practice when such an error has been to incarcerate or reincarcerate\ and holding that rearrest and reincarceration of mistakenly released prisoner did not \shock the contemporary conscience\
  • finding no violation where offender had been mistakenly released on parole for 20 months before being returned to prison
  • finding no violation of due process in reincarceration of an erroneously paroled North Carolina prisoner
  • discussing the different analysis that should be applied to legislative enactments and executive acts challenged as violating substantive due process rights
  • “[I]n view of their specific holdings the due process assumptions made in [Lundien] were dicta.”
  • listing several cases where the standard was not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.