Skip to main content
· 10/29/1991

Clarissa Miranda A/K/A Clarissa Miranda Rodriguez v. Ponce Federal Bank, Etc.

Citations

  • 948 F.2d 41
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25552
  • 1991 WL 217290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a timely RICO case statement is treated as part of the pleadings when deciding a motion to dismiss
  • dismissing RICO claims against bank where individual officers and employees also sued
  • “[T]he same entity cannot do double duty as both the RICO defendant and the RICO enterprise.”
  • “[T]he complaint must be anchored in a bed of facts, not allowed to float freely on a sea of bombast.”
  • \[T]he same entity cannot do double duty as both the RICO defendant and the RICO enterprise.\
  • “the same entity cannot do double duty as both the 4 RICO defendant and the RICO enterprise”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Coffin, Timbers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.