Clarence William McClure v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing three highway projects that included an overpass and twelve total miles of highway alternations
• “[W]e read § 771.111(f) as having tailored the general policy of § 1508.25(a) to the specific question of whether multiple highway projects are ‘in effect, a single course of action.’ See 40 C.F.R. § 1502.4(a).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).