Clarence Eric Powell v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where question has two possible meanings, supplemental instruction which is responsive to one meaning but misleading as to the other is error
• holding that where question has two possible meanings, supplemental instruction which is responsive to one meaning but misleading as to the other is error
• reversing even where the. court’s statement was legally correct but “when viewed in light of the jury’s [] question [wa]s confusing”
• “The trial court properly instructed the jury that the immoral purpose . . . [must] exist before the journey ends and supply the dominant motive for the trip.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).