Clarence Edgerton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Director, Office of Worker's Compensation Programs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the 1928 WCA applied to a claim where the majority of the claimant’s employment contacts were in Virginia; he lived in Virginia and was injured in Virginia; he may have driven into the District frequently while working; and his employer (WMATA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).