Claremont Press Publishing Co. v. Barksdale

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that veil piercing was appropriate when there was evidence, disputed by the defendant, that he agreed to be responsible for the debts of the insolvent corporation
• holding that veil piercing was appropriate when there was evidence, disputed by the defendant, that he agreed to be responsible for the debts of the insolvent corporation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).