· 2/25/2002
Claremont Flock Corp. v. Alm
Citations
- 281 F.3d 297
- 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 52
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864
- 2002 WL 243733
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a defendant cannot use Rule 60(b)(6) to obtain relief on a ground that comes within Rule 60(b)(1)
- “If a party is partly to blame, Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party . . . .”
- “If a party is partly to blame, Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party . . . .”
- pro se litigant not entitled to special treatment where court found litigant was “sophisticated” businessman
- “If a party is ‘partly to blame,’ Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party; instead, ‘relief must be sought within one year under subsection (1
- pro se litigant not entitled to special treatment where litigant was a “sophisticated” businessman
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.