Skip to main content
· 2/25/2002

Claremont Flock Corp. v. Alm

Citations

  • 281 F.3d 297
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 52
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 2864
  • 2002 WL 243733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a defendant cannot use Rule 60(b)(6) to obtain relief on a ground that comes within Rule 60(b)(1)
  • “If a party is partly to blame, Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party . . . .”
  • “If a party is partly to blame, Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party . . . .”
  • pro se litigant not entitled to special treatment where court found litigant was “sophisticated” businessman
  • “If a party is ‘partly to blame,’ Rule 60(b)(6) relief is not available to that party; instead, ‘relief must be sought within one year under subsection (1
  • pro se litigant not entitled to special treatment where litigant was a “sophisticated” businessman

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Selya, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.