Clardy v. BODOLOSKY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the broad scope of review in an equity proceeding “does not require this court to ignore the findings below when the trial court was in a better position to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses”
• “A legal question in an equity case receives review as in law.” (quoting Sloan v. Greenville Cty., 356 S.C. 531, 546, 590 S.E.2d 338, 346 (Ct. App. 2003))
• “The necessary elements for a contract are an offer, acceptance, and valuable consideration.”
• “Questions of law may be decided with no particular deference to the trial court.” (quoting S.C. Dep’t of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, LLC, 379 S.C. 645, 654, 667 S.E.2d 7, 12 (Ct. App. 2008))
• \Questions of law may be decided with no particular deference to the trial court.\ (quoting S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, LLC, 379 S.C. 645, 654, 667 S.E.2d 7, 12 (Ct. App. 2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).