Skip to main content
· 2/14/2024

Clara Faatz v. John Ashcroft, Missouri Secretary of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that the post-conviction court could order a retrial only if the petitioner established “such a sub- stantial denial of constitutional rights that his conviction is rendered void” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • explaining that the trial court can use the rules of evidence to “partly amelio- rate the kind of prejudice that parties can sometimes suffer in a retrial years after the original trial”
  • emphasizing that the post-conviction court could order a retrial only if the petitioner established “such a sub- stantial denial of constitutional rights that his conviction is rendered void” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • declining to decide whether to adopt that formulation of the former fugitive doctrine
  • declining to decide whether to adopt that formulation of the former fugitive doctrine
  • declining to address “[w]hether to adopt the former fugitive doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Russell, C.J., Fischer, Ransom and Gooch, concur; Powell, J., dissents in separate opinion filed; Wilson, J., concurs in opinion of Powell, J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.