Clapp v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that an act, which repealed part of a previous act, violated article 5, § 23 and stating that “the repeal effected by the act in no sense amended the original act; and the repealing act does not fall within the terms of [article 5, § 23]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).