Skip to main content
· 10/18/1913

Clapp v. Snohomish River Boom Co.

Citations

  • 76 Wash. 69
  • 135 P. 808
  • 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2185

Syllabus

<p>Appeal — Review—Verdict. A' verdict supported by conflicting evidence cannot be disturbed.</p> <p>Appeal — Review—Harmless Error. It is not prejudicial error to exclude a letter, offered merely to discredit a witness by its date, where the witness had not testified positively as to its date, and where the date of the letter was admitted and stated in the presence of the jury.</p>

Judges: Crow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.