Clapp v. Seibrecht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding evidence of appellant’s white supremacist views were relevant on the issue of appellant’s motive, were properly admitted for consideration by the sentencing authority as proper aggravation evidence, and did not violate appellant’s First Amendment rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).