Clapp v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing FDD same day as signing franchise agreement was a technical violation with no harm to franchisees
• providing FDD same day as signing franchise agreement was a technical violation with no harm to franchisees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern Wisconsin
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-03-29· cited 170×
• Nielsen v. McCabe
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 33×
• Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern Wisconsin
  Eighth Circuit· 1988-11-17· cited 21×
• Pacific Equipment & Irrigation, Inc. v. Toro Co.
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1994-07-26· cited 18×
• Hayden v. McDonald
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-08-28· cited 16×
• Randall v. Lady of America Franchise Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2007-07-24· cited 14×
• Red Roof Franchising, LLC v. AA Hospitality Northshore, LLC
  D. New Jersey· 2012-06-28· cited 14×
• Long John Silver's Inc. v. Nickleson
  W.D. Kentucky· 2013-02-12· cited 9×
• Wave Form Systems, Inc. v. AMS Sales Corp.
  D. Minnesota· 2014-12-22· cited 8×
• O'Donnell v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. (In Re Northeast Express Regional Airlines, Inc.)
  D. Maine· 1998-12-08· cited 3×
• Burger Dynasty, Inc. v. Bar 145 Franchising, L.L.C.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-30· cited 2×
• Unnamed case
  Eighth Circuit· 1984-08-28
• Cambria Company, LLC v. M&M Creative Laminants, Inc. dba M&M Creative Laminates, Inc., ...
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-09-11

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin Investors, Inc. v. Vander Bie
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-07-28· cited 43×
• Logan v. Panuska
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-04-04· cited 20×