Clanton v. Ruffner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of intimidating a witness should not have been admitted because “[t]he mere family relationship between appellant and [the person accused of intimidating the witness] is not enough, without more, to constitute adequate proof of the necessary authorization”
• a defendant’s attempt to 7 influence a witness can serve as circumstantial evidence of guilt
• considering evidence under Rule 404 (b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).