Clanton v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing a case for counsel's failure to comply with the schedule of the court
• holding that probate court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing will contest for contestants’ failure to file security for costs that had been ordered by probate court
• holding that trial court has “wide discretion in managing its docket,” as well as “a duty to schedule its cases in such a manner as to expeditiously dispose of them.”
• holding that probate court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing a will contest for contestants’ failure to file security for costs that had been ordered by the probate court
• holding that trial court has “wide discretion in managing its docket,” as well as “a duty to schedule its cases in such a manner as to expeditiously dispose of them.”
• explaining that “the court is given wide discretion in managing its docket” and reviewing court will not interfere absent a clear abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).