Clancy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “a breach of contract action for lost wages may not be maintained since claimant has not obtained reinstatement to her former position via an Article 78 proceeding, a condition precedent to such an action against a public employer”
• “[A] breach of contract action for lost wages [against the state] may not be maintained since claimant has not obtained reinstatement to her former position via an Article 78 proceeding, a condition precedent to such an action against a public employer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Finley v. Giacobbe
  Second Circuit· 1996-01-05· cited 84×
• Taylor v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1994-01-06· cited 5×
• Adebambo v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1999-04-27· cited 3×
• Finley v. Giacobbe
  S.D. New York· 1994-04-12· cited 2×
• Figueroa v. State
  New York State Court of Claims· 1984-11-20· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.
  New York Court of Appeals· 1983-03-29· cited 1,284×
• Austin v. Board of Higher Education
  New York Court of Appeals· 1959-04-09· cited 129×
• Koerner v. State of New York
  New York Court of Appeals· 1984-06-29· cited 82×
• City of Schenectady v. State Division of Human Rights
  New York Court of Appeals· 1975-07-08· cited 81×
• Schaffer v. Evans
  New York Court of Appeals· 1982-11-09· cited 35×
• C. B. Strain & Son, Inc. v. State of New York Health & Mental Hygiene Facilities Improvement Corp.
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1977-05-05· cited 8×
• Krumsiek v. Regan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-01-20· cited 2×