Claim of Ross v. Hansen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that under the state constitution it is a violation of a defendant’s rights to interrogate him with knowledge that he is represented by counsel, albeit on a separate unrelated charge
• a suspect, represented by counsel on a prior pending charge, may not waive his rights in the absence of counsel and answer questions on new unrelated charges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).