Claim of McDonald v. City of New York

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that parol evidence rule “operates to exclude evidence of all prior or contemporaneous negotiations between the parties offered to contradict or modify the terms of their writing”
• evidence of all prior or contemporaneous negotiations between the parties offered to contradict or modify the terms of the writing excluded
• parol evidence rule bars consideration of alleged oral agreement between maker, lender, and third party that proceeds from sale of collateral pledged by third party would be applied first to satisfy note
• “[Wjhere the parties have reduced their agreement to an integrated writing, the parol evidence rule operates to exclude evidence of all prior or contemporaneous negotiations between the parties offered to contradict or modify the terms of their writing.”
• applying New York's parol evidence rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).