Claim of McCarty v. United States Trucking Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 44-foot tower was not an accessory use customarily incidental to the highly classified residential area
• observing that scope of amateur radio operator’s hobby may carry it beyond what is customary or permissible
• “While we have never supported a zoning ordinance which restricts the use of property for a purely aesthetic reason alone, we have stated that such considerations are not wholly without weight.”
• erection of forty-four foot radio tower not an accessory use incidental to residential area
• erection of forty-four foot radio tower not an accessory use incidental to residential area
• prohibition of 44 foot tower in residentially zoned area upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).