Claim of Lockwood v. Luckey Platt & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to follow Supreme Court’s interpretation of Fourth Amendment in interpreting state constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
• declining to follow Supreme Court's interpretation of Fourth Amendment in interpreting state constitution's prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures
• The Supreme Court reviewed a New York decision because of a lack of a plain statement that it relied upon state law. On remand, the Court of Appeals of New York reinstated its earlier judgment, stating that it found a violation of its state constitution.
• The Supreme Court reviewed a New York decision because of a lack of a plain statement that it relied upon slate law. On remand, the Court of Appeals of New York reinstated its earlier judgment, stating that it found a violation of its state constitution.
• disallowing entry into vehicle to uncover vehicle identification number

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).